Archbishop Annibale Bugnini was instrumental in the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council. He is often reviled by traditionalists because of the hand they believe he played in the decimation of Catholic liturgy and particularly Catholic liturgical music. It seems unfortunate to me that the Church, at least in the U.S., often seems resigned to the singing of nice enough hymns, but hymns that seem to me to have little to do with the actual liturgy, and unfortunately replace the antiphons that are actually proper to the Mass. I would love to see a return to the singing of the liturgical antiphons instead of hymns that often, at the very least have no thematic relevance to the liturgy of the day, often are insipid, and at times border on heretical.
Back to Bugnini. As I said, Bugnini is often reviled by traditionalists because of the role he played in Vatican II. It seems that every time a questionable hymn is sung in Mass, a radical traditionalist will say something to the effect of, "Oh, this stinks of Bugnini." Unfortunately traditionalists are missing a great opportunity here. I strongly believe that when it comes to the restoration of the Roman liturgy the only thing we need to do is turn to the actual documents of Vatican II, and to the instructions of the Pauline liturgy, and I think the same can be said of the influence of Bugnini. Bugnini's own words can be a great defense against the trite and banal (and ubiquitous) non-liturgical music used in so many Catholic Masses today. Over at New Liturgical Movement, easily my favorite blog when it comes to things liturgical, they include this prescient quote from Bugnini regarding the use and the quality of vernacular hymns:
That rule [permitting vernacular hymns] has been superseded. What must be sung is the Mass, its ordinary and proper, not "something," no matter how consistent, that is imposed on the Mass. Because the liturgical service is one, it has only one countenance, one motif, one voice, the voice of the church. To continue to replace the texts of the Mass being celebrated with motets that are reverent and devout, yet out of keeping with the Mass of the day amounts to continuing an unacceptable ambiguity: it is to cheat the people. Liturgical song involves not mere melody, but words, text, thought, and the sentiments that the poetry and music contain. Thus texts must be those of the Mass, not others, and singing means singing the Mass not just singing during Mass.
There is indeed a proper place for hymns in our liturgical celebrations, but that place is in the celebration of the Liturgy of the Hours. And while Vatican II is clear that hymns may be used in the liturgy, its allowance nonetheless leaves the preference clearly with the singing of the proper antiphons, and certainly a level of quality, solemnity, beauty and liturgical continuity must be maintained in the selection. So many of the hymnals that we find in churches today offer choices of little redeeming value, in my opinion, and I believe we would be much better served with a Roman hymnal that places greater emphasis on proper antiphons and on hymns of sound theology and liturgical form.
Perhaps it is true that many Catholics have gotten comfortable with the hymns we use today. They are easy enough so that if someone cares to sing along they can. They are like an old sock, comfortable and unassuming. They don't stir anything within us, they just simply are there, and we've come to expect their presence. But let's be honest, the vast majority of the hymns we sing in Mass don't reflect the beauty and grandeur of God, they don't reflect the solemnity of the Mass and of the Sacrifice being offered, and they definitely stand no chance of drawing lost and searching souls into the truly transcendent experience that Divine Liturgy is supposed to be.
I believe that as Catholics we do well to follow the lead and pay attention to the example of our Holy Father. The changes he is making in his own personal liturgical celebrations should serve as a guide for how we should model our own. If you are a liturgical director, if you have any influence on the formation of the liturgy in your own parish, pay attention to the papal liturgies, pay attention to the guidance that the Holy Father offers, pay attention to the directives that he offers to this suffering Church, a Church suffering from liturgical ennui. Observe his example, his expressed desires for liturgical reform, and make it happen in your own parish!