Thursday, July 30, 2009

Seeking a life of…oooh, bright shiny light!

There are times when I wish I had a vocation to the contemplative life. I do not, of that I am quite sure, but there are times when I wish that I did.

When I was seeing a psychologist last year battling some depression one of the things that she pointed out as potentially relevant and worthy of further examination was my desire for discipline. Whether by nature, by habit, or some combination of the two, I am a very undisciplined person. I am easily distracted and as a result I often find myself stressed about time because I have done nothing that I wanted to do or needed to do. This is the case in school, hence why the papers that I write have never yet come close to reaching the potential that I have, both because I do not do the readings comprehensively and I do not spend enough time on the actual writing and editing. I have been fortunate to get by with a certain intellectual acumen that allows me to not read something, wait until the night before a paper is due, throw something together and get an A. But I don't want to be like this. I want to be disciplined. This is why despite the fact that I am set to graduate from an excellent school with a top rate philosophy department that my understanding of philosophy remains cursory at best. I do better with theology because I actually spend leisure time reading theology and digesting it, and I write about it so frequently. But even there I am hardly where I could and should be.

Anyway, the psychologist noted that I had once attempted to enlist in the Army, that I am seeking religious life, that I've always been involved in organized sports, and she just pointed out that it was interesting that I seem to always seek out structure. And she's right. I always feel like I am this completely unharnessed potential, and my lack of focus and lack of discipline is preventing me from learning and contributing in the way that I hope and the way that I am capable. I have the people skills down pat, and I have the intellectual acumen, but I am so sorely lacking in discipline.

Getting back to my opening sentence, this also has an effect on my spiritual life. So often my prayer life suffers in the same way that my intellectual life does, and so my prayer life would benefit greatly from structure, also. I distract myself so easily, typically on the internet, sometimes with television, that I tend to dedicate very little time to prayer. I go through great ups and downs. Some days I am highly disciplined in the prayer area, where I will pray the Office and spend long hours in contemplation; other days I do no more than pray a distracted Lauds and a rote grace before meals. Sometimes not even that.

I am hoping that this next phase of my life, this official entrance into religious life, will help correct these poor habits of mine, and enable me to harness the gifts that I have. When I devote myself to prayer I have found myself greatly and ineffably blessed by God. When I devote myself to my studies I find myself capable of keen insights into faith. When I spend days on end distracted by the internet then I find my spiritual life suffering and my habits of argument reverting to dances with language that are of no service to anyone.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Augustine Day by Day: Chaste Fear

Just from the fact that you try to avoid evil, you improve yourself, and you begin to desire what is good. When you begin to desire what is good, there will be a chaste fear in you.

That fear by which you fear being cast into hell with the devil is not yet chaste, since it does not come from the love of God but from the fear of punishment. But when you fear God in the sense that you do not wish to lose him, you embrace him, and you desire to enjoy him.

-- Sermon on 1 John 9, 5

Prayer: Lord, I now love you alone, I follow you alone, and I seek you alone. I yearn to be possessed by you.

-- Soliloquies 1, 1

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Christ and the Church

As a supplement to our study of the early Fathers and the various issues of the Church, I am going to post a series of catechetical talks given by Pope Benedict XVI, a series titled Jesus, the Apostles, and the Early Church. These talks were given at the regular Wednesday audiences from March 15, 2006 to February 14, 2007. This first one is on the subject of the mystery of the relationship between Christ and the Church:

Christ and the Church

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

Following the Catecheses on the Psalms and Canticles of Lauds and of Vespers, I would like to dedicate the upcoming Wednesday Audiences to the mystery of the relationship between Christ and the Church, reflecting upon it from the experience of the Apostles, in light of the duty entrusted to them.

The Church was built on the foundation of the Apostles as a community of faith, hope and charity. Through the Apostles, we come to Jesus himself. The Church begins to establish herself when some fishermen of Galilee meet Jesus, allowing themselves to be won over by his gaze, his voice, his warm and strong invitation:  "Follow me, and I will make you become fishers of men" (Mk 1: 17; Mt 4: 19).

At the start of the third millennium, my beloved Predecessor John Paul II invited the Church to contemplate the Face of Christ (cf. Novo Millennio Ineunte, n. 16 ff.). Continuing in the same direction, I would like to show, in the Catechesis that I begin today, how it is precisely the light of that Face that is reflected on the face of the Church (cf. Lumen Gentiumn. 1), notwithstanding the limits and shadows of our fragile and sinful humanity. 

After Mary, a pure reflection of the light of Christ, it is from the Apostles, through their word and witness, that we receive the truth of Christ. Their mission is not isolated, however, but is situated within a mystery of communion that involves the entire People of God and is carried out in stages from the Old to the New Covenant.

In this regard, it must be said that the message of Jesus is completely misunderstood if it is separated from the context of the faith and hope of the Chosen People:  like John the Baptist, his direct Precursor, Jesus above all addresses Israel (cf. Mt 15: 24) in order to "gather" it together in the eschatological time that arrived with him. And like that of John, the preaching of Jesus is at the same time a call of grace and a sign of contradiction and of justice for the entire People of God.

And so, from the first moment of his salvific activity, Jesus of Nazareth strives to gather together the People of God. Even if his preaching is always an appeal for personal conversion, in reality he continually aims to build the People of God whom he came to bring together, purify and save.

As a result, therefore, an individualistic interpretation of Christ's proclamation of the Kingdom, specific to liberal theology, is unilateral and without foundation, as a great liberal theologian Adolf von Harnack summed it up in the year 1900 in his lessons on The essence of Christianity:  "The Kingdom of God, insofar as it comes in single individuals, is able to enter their soul and is welcomed by them. The Kingdom of God is the dominion of God, certainly, but it is the dominion of the holy God in individual hearts" (cf. Third Lesson, 100 ff.).

In reality, this individualism of liberal theology is a typically modern accentuation:  in the perspective of biblical tradition and on the horizon of Judaism, where the work of Jesus is situated in all its novelty, it is clear that the entire mission of the Son-made-flesh has a communitarian finality. He truly came to unite dispersed humanity; he truly came to unite the People of God. 

An evident sign of the intention of the Nazarene to gather together the community of the Covenant, to demonstrate in it the fulfilment of the promises made to the Fathers who always speak of convocation, unification, unity, is the institution of the Twelve. We heard about this institution of the Twelve in the Gospel reading. I shall read the central passage again:  "And he went up into the hills and called to him those whom he desired; and they came to him. And he appointed twelve to be with him, and to be sent out to preach and have authority to cast out demons. The names of the twelve Apostles are these..." (Mk 3: 13-16; cf. Mt 10: 1-4; Lk 6: 12-16).

On the site of the revelation, "the mount", taking initiative that demonstrates absolute awareness and determination, Jesus establishes the Twelve so that, together with him, they are witnesses and heralds of the coming of the Kingdom of God.

There are no doubts about the historicity of this call, not only because of the antiquity and multiplicity of witnesses, but also for the simple reason that there is also the name of Judas, the Apostle who betrayed him, notwithstanding the difficulties that this presence could have caused the new community.

The number 12, which evidently refers to the 12 tribes of Israel, already reveals the meaning of the prophetic-symbolic action implicit in the new initiative to re-establish the holy people. As the system of the 12 tribes had long since faded out, the hope of Israel awaited their restoration as a sign of the eschatological time (as referred to at the end of the Book of Ezekiel:  37: 15-19; 39: 23-29; 40-48).

In choosing the Twelve, introducing them into a communion of life with himself and involving them in his mission of proclaiming the Kingdom in words and works (cf. Mk 6: 7-13; Mt 10: 5-8; Lk 9: 1-6; 6: 13), Jesus wants to say that the definitive time has arrived in which to constitute the new People of God, the people of the 12 tribes, which now becomes a universal people, his Church. 
Appeal for Israel

With their very own existence, the Twelve - called from different backgrounds - become an appeal for all of Israel to convert and allow herself to be gathered into the new covenant, complete and perfect fulfilment of the ancient one. The fact that he entrusted to his Apostles, during the Last Supper and before his Passion, the duty to celebrate his Pasch, demonstrates how Jesus wished to transfer to the entire community, in the person of its heads, the mandate to be a sign and instrument in history of the eschatological gathering begun by him. In a certain sense we can say that the Last Supper itself is the act of foundation of the Church, because he gives himself and thus creates a new community, a community united in communion with himself.

In this light, one understands how the Risen One confers upon them, with the effusion of the Spirit, the power to forgive sins (cf. Jn 20: 23). Thus, the Twelve Apostles are the most evident sign of Jesus' will regarding the existence and mission of his Church, the guarantee that between Christ and the Church there is no opposition:  despite the sins of the people who make up the Church, they are inseparable. 

Therefore, a slogan that was popular some years back:  "Jesus yes, Church no", is totally inconceivable with the intention of Christ. This individualistically chosen Jesus is an imaginary Jesus.

We cannot have Jesus without the reality he created and in which he communicates himself. Between the Son of God-made-flesh and his Church there is a profound, unbreakable and mysterious continuity by which Christ is present today in his people. He is always contemporary with us, he is always contemporary with the Church, built on the foundation of the Apostles and alive in the succession of the Apostles. And his very presence in the community, in which he himself is always with us, is the reason for our joy. Yes, Christ is with us, the Kingdom of God is coming.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Augustine’s Exposition on Psalm 88

A friend recently commented on the 88th Psalm, and the dark nature of it, and so I thought I would share St. Augustine's exposition on the same. Augustine recognizes the Christocentric nature of the Old Testament and particularly the Psalms perhaps better than anyone, and this is a classic example of such:

1. The Title of this eighty-seventh Psalm contains a fresh subject for enquiry: the words occurring here, "for Melech to respond," being nowhere else found. We have already given our opinion on the meaning of the titles Psalmus Cantici and Canticum Psalmi:(1) and the words, "sons of Core," are constantly repeated, and have often been explained: so also "to the end;" but what comes next in this title is peculiar. For "Melech" we may translate into Latin "for the chorus," for chorus is the sense of the Hebrew word Melech.(2) ... The Passion of our Lord is here prophesied. Now the Apostle Peter saith, "Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that we should follow His steps;"(3) this is the meaning of "to respond." The Apostle John also saith, "As Christ laid down His life for us, so ought we also to lay down our lives for the brethren;"(4) this also is to respond. But the choir signifies concord, which consists in charity: whoever therefore in imitation of our Lord's Passion gives up his body to be burnt, if he have not charity, does not answer in the choir, and therefore it profiteth him nothing.(5) Further, as in Latin the terms Precentor and Succentor are used to denote in music the performer who sings the first part, and him who takes it up; just so in this song of the Passion, Christ going before is followed by the choir of martyrs Unto the end of gaining crowns in Heaven. This is sung by" the sons of Core," that is, the imitators of Christ's Passion: as Christ was crucified in Calvary, which is the interpretation of the Hebrew word Core.(6) This also is "the understanding of AEman the Israelite:"(7) words occurring at the end of this title. AEman is said to mean, "his brother:" for Christ deigns to make those His brethren, who understand the mystery of His Cross, and not only are not ashamed of it, but faithfully glory in it, not praising themselves for their own merits, but grateful for His grace: so that it may be said to each of them, "Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom there is no guile,"(8) just as holy Scripture says of Israel himself, that he was without guile.(9)

2. "O Lord God of my salvation, I have cried day and night before Thee" (verse 1). Let us therefore now hear the voice of Christ singing before us in prophecy, to whom His own choir should respond either in imitation, or in thanksgiving. "O let my prayer enter into Thy presence, incline Thine ear unto my calling" (verse 2). For even our Lord prayed, not in the form of God, but in the form of a servant; for in this He also suffered. He prayed both in prosperous times, that is, by "day," and in calamity, which I imagine is meant by "night." The entrance of prayer into God's presence is its acceptance: the inclination of His ear is His compassionate listening to it: for God has not such bodily members as we have. The passage is however, as usual, a repetition.(10)

3. "For my soul is filled with evils, and my life draweth nigh unto hell" (verse 3). Dare we speak of the Soul of Christ as" filled with evils," when the passion had strength as far as it had any, only over the body? ... The soul therefore may feel pain without the body: but without the soul the body cannot. Why therefore should we not say that the Soul of Christ was full of the evils of humanity, though not of human sins? Another Prophet says of Him, that He grieved for us:(11) and the Evangelist says, "And He took with Him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy:" and our Lord Himself saith unto them of Himself, "My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death."(12) The Prophet who composed this Psalm, foreseeing that this would happen, introduces Him saying, "My soul is full of evils, and My life draweth nigh unto hell." For the very same sense is here expressed in other words, as when He said, "My soul is sorrowful, even unto death." The words, "My soul is sorrowful," are like these, "My soul is full of evils:" and what follows, "even unto death," like, "my life draweth nigh unto hell." These feelings of human infirmity our Lord took upon Him, as He did the flesh of human infirmity, and the death of human flesh, not by the necessity of His condition, but by the free will of His mercy, that He might transfigure into Himself His own body, which is the Church (the head of which He deigned to be), that is, His members in His holy and faithful disciples: that if amid human temptations any one among them happened to be in sorrow and pain, he might not therefore think that he was separated from His favour: that the body, like the chorus following its leader, might learn from its Head, that these sorrows were not sin, but proofs of human weakness. We read of the Apostle Paul, a chief member in this body, and we hear him confessing that his soul was full of such evils, when he says, that he feels "great heaviness and continual sorrow in heart for his brethren according to the flesh, who are Israelites."(1) And if we say that our Lord was sorrowful for them also at the approach of His Passion, in which they would incur the most atrocious guilt, I think we shall not speak amiss. Lastly, the very thing said by our Saviour on the Cross, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do,"(2) is expressed in this Psalm below, "I am counted as one of them that go down into the pit" (verse 4): by them who knew not what they were doing, when they imagined that He died like other men, subjected to necessity, and overcome by it. The word "pit" is used for the depth of woe or of Hell. "I have been as a man that hath no help."

4. "Free among the dead" (verse 5). In these words our Lord's Person is most clearly shown: for who else is free among the dead but He who though in the likeness of sinful flesh is alone among sinners without sin?(3) ... He therefore, "free among the dead," who had it in His power to lay down His life, and again to take it; from whom no one could take it, but He laid it down of His own free will; who could revive His own flesh, as a temple destroyed by them, at His will; who, when all had forsaken Him on the eve of His Passion, remained not alone, because, as He testifies, His Father forsook Him not;(4) was nevertheless by His enemies, for whom He prayed, who knew not what they did, ... counted "as one who hath no help; like unto them that are wounded, and lie in the grave." But he adds, "Whom thou dost not yet remember:" and in these words there is to be remarked a distinction between Christ and the rest of the dead. For though He was wounded, and when dead laid in the tomb,(5) yet they who knew not what they were doing, or who He was, regarded Him as like others who had perished from their wounds, and who slept in the tomb, who are as yet out of remembrance of God, that is, whose hour of resurrection has not yet arrived. For thus the Scripture speaks of the dead as sleeping, because it wishes them to be regarded as destined to awake, that is, to rise again. But He, wounded and asleep in the tomb, awoke on the third day, and became "like a sparrow that sitteth alone on the housetop,"(6) that is, on the right hand of His Father in Heaven: and now "dieth no more, death shall no more have dominion over Him."(7) Hence He differs widely from those whom God hath not yet remembered to cause their resurrection after this manner: for what was to go before in the Head, was kept for the Body in the end. God is then said to remember, when He does an act: then to forget, when He does it not: for neither can God forget, as He never changes, nor remember, as He can never forget. "I am counted" then, by those who know not what they do, "as a man that hath no help:" while I am "free among the dead," I am held by these men "like unto them that are wounded, and lie in the grave." Yet those very men, who account thus of Me, are further said to be "cut away from Thy hand," that is, when I was made so by them, "they were cut away from Thy hand;" they who believed Me destitute of help, are deprived of the help of Thy hand: for they, as he saith in another Psalm,(8) have digged a pit before me, and are fallen into the midst of it themselves. I prefer this interpretation to that which refers the words, "they are cut away from Thy hand," to those who sleep in the tomb, whom God hath not yet remembered: since the righteous are among the latter, of whom, even though God hath not yet called them to the resurrection, it is said, that their "souls are in the hands of God,"(9) that is, that "they dwell under the defence of the Most High; and shall abide under the shadow of the God of Heaven."(10) But it is those who are cut away from the hand of God, who believed that Christ was cut off from His hand, and thus accounting Him among the wicked, dared to slay Him.

5. "They laid Me in the lowest pit" (verse 6), that is, the deepest pit. For so it is in the Greek. But what is the lowest pit, but the deepest woe, than which there is none more deep? Whence in another Psalm it is said, "Thou broughtest me out also of the pit of misery."(11) "In a place of darkness, and in the shadow of death," whiles they knew not what they did, they laid Him there, thus deeming of Him; they knew not Him "whom none of the princes of this world knew."(12) By the "shadow of death," I know not whether the death of the body is to be understood, or that of which it is written, "That they walked in darkness and in the land of the shadow of death, a light is risen on them,"(13) because by belief they were brought from out of the darkness and death of sin into light and life. Such an one those who knew not what they did thought our Lord, and in their ignorance accounted Him among those whom He came to help, that they might not be such themselves.

6. "Thy indignation lieth hard upon Me" (verse 7), or, as other copies have it, "Thy anger;" or, as others, "Thy fury:" the Greek word qumos having undergone different interpretations. For where the Greek copies have orgh, no translator hesitated to express it by the Latin ira; but where the word is qumos, most object to rendering it by ira, although many of the authors of the best Latin style, in their translations from Greek philosophy, have thus rendered the word in Latin. But I shall not discuss this matter further: only if I also were to suggest another term, I should think "indignation" more tolerable than "fury," this word in Latin not being applied to persons in their senses. What then does this mean, "Thy indignation lieth hard upon Me," except the belief of those, who knew not the Lord of Glory?(1) who imagined that the anger of God was not merely roused, but lay hard upon Him, whom they dared to bring to death, and not only death, but that kind, which they regarded as the most execrable of all, namely, the death of the Cross: whence saith the Apostle, "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth upon a tree."(2) On this account, wishing to praise His obedience which He carried to the extreme of humility, he says, "He humbled Himself, and became obedient unto death;" and as this seemed little, he added, "even the death of the Cross;"(3) and with the same view as far as I can see, he says in this Psalm, "And all thy suspensions," or, as some translate "waves," others "tossings," "Thou hast brought over Me." We also find in another Psalm, "All thy suspensions and waves are come in upon Me,"(4) or, as some have translated better, "have passed over Me:" for it is dihlqon in Greek, not eishlqon: and where both expressions are employed, "waves" and "suspensions," one cannot be used as equivalent to the other. In that passage we explained "suspensions" as threatenings, "waves" as the actual sufferings: both inflicted by God's judgment: but in that place it is said, "All have passed over Me," here, "Thou hast brought all upon Me." In the other case, that is, although some evils took place, yet, he said, all those which are here mentioned passed over; but in this case, "Thou hast brought them upon Me." Evils pass over when they do not touch a man, as things which hang over him, or when they do touch him, as waves. But when he uses the word "suspensions," he does not say they passed over, but, "Thou hast brought them upon Me," meaning that all which impended had come to pass. All things which were predicted of His Passion impended, as long as they remained in the prophecies for future fulfilment.

7. "Thou hast put Mine acquaintance far from Me (verse 8). If we understand by acquaintance those whom He knew, it will be all men; for whom knew He not? But He calls those acquaintance, to whom He was Himself known, as far as they could know Him at that season: at least so far forth as they knew Him to be innocent, although they considered Him only as a man, not as likewise God. Although He might call the righteous whom He approved, acquaintance, as He calls the wicked unknown, to whom He was to say at the end, "I know you not."(5) In what follows, "and they have set Me for an abhorrence to themselves;" those whom He called before "acquaintance," may be meant, as even they felt horror at the mode of that death: but it is better referred to those of whom He was speaking above as His persecutors. "I was delivered up, and did not get forth." Is this because His disciples were without, while He was being tried within?(6) Or are we to give a deeper meaning to the words, "I cannot get forth" as signifying, "I remained hidden in My secret counsels, I showed not who I was, I did not reveal Myself, was not made manifest"? And so it follows,-- "My eyes became weak from want" (verse 9). For what eyes are we to understand? If the eyes of the flesh in which He suffered, we do not read that His eyes became weak from want, that is, from hunger, in His Passion, as is often the case; as He was betrayed after His Supper, and crucified on the same day: if the inner eyes, how were they weakened from want, in which there was a light that could never fail? But He meant by His eyes those members in the body, of which He was Himself the head, which, as brighter and more eminent and chief above the rest, He loved. It was of this body that the Apostle was speaking, when he wrote, taking his metaphor from our own body, "If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing?" etc.(7) What he wished understood by these words, he has expressed more clearly, by adding, "Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular."(8) Wherefore as those eyes, that is, the holy Apostles, to whom not flesh and blood, but the Father which is in Heaven had revealed Him, so that Peter said, "Thou art Christ, the Son of the Living God,"(9) when they saw Him betrayed, and suffering such evils, saw Him not such as they wished, as He did not come forth, did not manifest Himself in His virtue and power, but still hidden in His secrecy,(10) endured everything as a man overcome and enfeebled, they became weak for want, as if their food, their Light, had been withdrawn from them.

8. He continues, "And I have called upon Thee." This indeed He did most clearly, when upon the Cross. But what follows? "All the day I have stretched forth My hands unto Thee," must be examined how it must be taken. For if in this expression we understand the tree of the Cross, how can we reconcile it with the "whole day"? Can He be said to have hung upon the Cross during the whole day, as the night is considered a part of the day? But if day, as opposed to night, was meant by this expression, even of this day, the first and no small portion had passed by at the time of His crucifixion. But if we take "day" in the same sense of time (especially as the word is used in the feminine, a gender which is restricted to that sense in Latin, although not so in Greek, as it is always used in the feminine, which I suppose to be the reason for its translation in the same gender in our own version), the knot of the question will be drawn tighter: for how can it mean for the whole space of time, if He did not even for one day stretch forth His hands on the Cross? Further, should we take the whole for a part, as Scripture sometimes uses this expression, I do not remember an instance in which the whole is taken for a part, when the word "whole" is expressly added. For in the passage of the Gospel where the Lord saith, "The Son of Man shall be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth,"(1) it is no extraordinary licence to take the whole for the part, the expression not being for three "whole" days and three whole nights: since the one intermediate day was a whole one, the other two were parts, the last being part of the first day, the first part of the last. But if the Cross is not meant here, but the prayer, which we find in the Gospel that He poured forth in the form of a servant to God the Father, where He is said to have prayed long before His Passion, and on the eve of His Passion, and also when on the Cross, we do not read anywhere that He did so throughout the whole day. Therefore by the stretched-out hands throughout the whole day, we may understand the continuation of good works in which He never ceased from exertion.

9. But as His good works profited only the predestined to eternal salvation, and not all men, nor even all those among whom they were done, he adds, "Dost thou show wonders among the dead?" (verse 10). If we suppose this relates to those whose flesh life has left, great wonders have been wrought among the dead, inasmuch as some of them have revived:(2) and in our Lord's descent into Hell, and His ascent as the conqueror of death, a great wonder was wrought among the dead. He refers then in these words, "Dost Thou show wonders among the dead?" to men so dead in heart, that such great works of Christ could not rouse them to the life of faith: for he does not say that wonders are not shown to them because they see them not, but because they do not profit them. For, as he says in this passage, "the whole day have I stretched forth My hands to Thee:" because He ever refers all His works to the will of His Father, constantly declaring that He came to fulfil His Father's will:(3) so also, as an unbelieving people saw the same works, another Prophet saith, "I have spread out my hands all day unto a rebellious people, that believes not, but contradicts."(4) Those then are dead, to whom wonders have not been shown, not because they saw them not, but since they lived not again through them. The following verse, "Shall physicians revive them, and shall they praise Thee?" means, that the dead shall not be revived by such means, that they may praise Thee. In the Hebrew there is said to be a different expression: giants being used where physicians are here: but the Septuagint translators, whose authority is such that they may deservedly be said to have interpreted by the inspiration of the Spirit of God owing to their wonderful agreement, conclude, not by mistake, but taking occasion from the resemblance in sound between the Hebrew words expressing these two senses, that the use of the word is an indication of the sense in which the word giants is meant to be taken. For if you suppose the proud meant by giants, of whom the Apostle saith, "Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world?"(5) there is no incongruity in calling them physicians, as if by their own unaided skill they promised the salvation of souls: against whom it is said, "Of the Lord is safety."(6) But if we take the word giant in a good sense, as it is said of our Lord, "He rejoiceth as a giant to run his course;"(7) that is Giant of giants, chief among the greatest and strongest, who in His Church excel in spiritual strength. Just as He is the Mountain of mountains; as it is written, "And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be manifested in the top of the mountains:"(8) and the Saint of saints: there is no absurdity in styling these same great and mighty men physicians. Whence saith the Apostle, "if by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them."(9) But even such physicians, even though they cure not by their own power (as not even of their own do those of the body), yet so far forth as by faithful ministry they assist towards salvation, can cure the living, but not raise the dead: of whom it is said, "Dost Thou show wonders among the dead?" For the grace of God, by which men's minds in a certain manner are brought to live a fresh life, so as to be able to hear the lessons of salvation from any of its ministers whatever, is most hidden and mysterious. This grace is thus spoken of in the Gospel. "No man can come to Me, except the Father which hath sent Me draw him;"(1) ... in order to show, that the very faith by which the soul believes, and springs into fresh life from the death of its former affections, is given us by God. Whatever exertions, then, the best preachers of the word,(2) and persuaders of the truth through miracles, may make with men, just like great physicians: yet if they are dead, and through Thy grace have not a second life, "Dost Thou show wonders among the dead, or shall physicians raise them? and shall they" whom they raise "praise Thee"? For this confession declares that they live: not, as it is written elsewhere, "Thanksgiving perisheth from the dead, as from one that is not."(3)

10. "Shall one show Thy loving-kindness in the grave, or Thy faithfulness in destruction?" (verse 11). The word "show" is of course understood as if repeated, Shall any show Thy faithfulness in destruction? Scripture loves to connect loving-kindness and faithfulness, especially in the Psalms. "Destruction" also is a repetition of "the grave," and signifies them who are in the grave, styled above "the dead," in the verse, "Dost thou show wonders among the dead?" for the body is the grave of the dead soul; whence our Lord's words in the Gospel, "Ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but within are full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity."(4)

11. "Shall thy wondrous works be known in the dark, and thy righteousness in the land where all things are forgotten?" (verse 12), the dark answers to the land of forgetfulness: for the unbelieving are meant by the dark, as the Apostle saith, "For ye were sometimes darkness;"(5) and the land where all things are forgotten, is the man who has forgotten God; for the unbelieving soul can arrive at darkness so intense, "that the fool saith in his heart, There is no God."(6) Thus the meaning of the whole passage may thus be drawn out in its connection: "Lord, I have called upon Thee," amid My sufferings; "all day I have stretched forth my hands unto Thee" (verse 13). I have never ceased to stretch forth My works to glorify, Thee. Why then do the wicked rage against Me, unless because "Thou showest not wonders among the dead"? because those wonders move them not to faith, nor can physicians restore them to life that they may praise Thee, because Thy hidden grace works not in them to draw them unto believing: because no man cometh unto Me, but whom Thou hast drawn. Shall then "Thy lovingkindness be showed in the grave"? that is, the grave of the dead soul, which lies dead beneath the body's weight: "or Thy faithfulness in destruction"? that is, in such a death as cannot believe or feel any of these things. "For how then in the darkness" of this death, that is, in the man who in forgetting Thee has lost the light of his life, "shall Thy wondrous works and Thy righteousness be known." ...

12. But that those prayers, the blessings of which surpass all words, may be more fervent and more constant, the gift that shall last unto eternity is deferred, while transitory evils are allowed to thicken. And so it follows: "Lord, why hast Thou cast off my prayer?" (verse 14), which may be compared with another Psalm:(7) "My God, My God, look upon me; why hast Thou forsaken me?" The reason is made matter of question, not as if the wisdom of God were blamed as doing so without a cause; and so here. "Lord, why hast Thou cast off my prayer?" But if this cause be attended to carefully, it will be found indicated above; for it is with the view that the prayers of the Saints are, as it were, repelled by the delay of so great a blessing, and by the adversity they encounter in the troubles of life, that the flame, thus fanned, may burst into a brighter blaze.

13. For this purpose he briefly sketches in what follows the troubles of Christ's body. For it is not in the Head alone that they took place, since it is said to Saul too, "Why persecutest thou Me?"(8) and Paul himself, as if placed as an elect member in the same body, saith, "That I may fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh."(9) "Why then, Lord, hast Thou cast off my soul? why hidest Thou Thy face from me?" "I am poor, and in toils from my youth up: and when lifted up, I was thrown down, and troubled" (verse 15). "Thy wraths went over me: Thy terrors disturbed me" (verse 16). "They came round about me all day like water: they compassed me about together" (verse 17). "A friend Thou hast put far from me: and mine acquaintance from my misery" (verse 18). All these evils have taken place, and are happening in the limbs of Christ's body, and God turns away His face from their prayers, by not hearing as to what they wish for, since they know not that the fulfilment of their wishes would not be good for them. The Church is "poor," as she hungers and thirsts in her wanderings for that food with which she shall be filled in her own country: she is "in toils from her youth up," as the very Body of Christ saith in another Psalm, "Many a time have they overcome me from my youth."(1) And for this reason some of her members are lifted up even in this world, that in them may be the greater lowliness. Over that Body, which constitutes the unity of the Saints and the faithful, whose Head is Christ, go the wraths of God: yet abide not: since it is of the unbelieving only that it is written, that "the wrath of God abideth upon him."(2) The terrors of God disturb the weakness of the faithful, because all that can happen, even though it actually happen not, it is prudent to fear; and sometimes these terrors so agitate the reflecting soul with the evils impending around, that they seem to flow around us on every side like water, and to encircle us in our fears. And as the Church while on pilgrimage is never free from these evils, happening as they do at one moment in one of her limbs, at another in another, he adds, "all day," signifying the continuation in time, to the end of this world. Often too, friends and acquaintances, their worldly interests at stake, in their terror forsake the Saints; of which saith the Apostle, "all men forsook me: may it not be laid to their charge."(3) But to what purpose is all this, but that early in the morning, that is, after the night of unbelief, the prayers of this holy Body may in the light of faith prevent God, until the coming of that salvation, which we are at present saved by hoping for, not by having, while we await it with patience and faithfulness. Then the Lord will not repel our prayers, as there will no longer be anything to be sought for, but everything that has been rightly asked, will be obtained: nor will He turn His face away from us, since we shall see Him as He is:(4) nor shall we be poor, because God will be our abundance, all in all:(5) nor shall we suffer, as there will be no more weakness: nor after exaltation shall we meet with humiliation and confusion, as there will be no adversity there: nor bear even the transient wrath of God, as we shall abide in His abiding love: nor will His terrors agitate us, because His promises realized will bless us: nor will our friend and acquaintance, being terrified, be far from us, where there will be no foe to dread.

The Nascent Church – An Examination of the Early Fathers

One of the great challenges in ecumenical discussions is how to appropriately translate particular biblical texts. Some of the biggest issues affected by this problem of correct interpretation include: apostolic succession, celebration of the Eucharist, authority of ordained ministry, the nature of the Church, and the respective roles of Scripture and Tradition. In each of these issues, arguments are crafted using biblical verses and references to various Scriptures, and in the end it seems as if it just comes down to how one chooses to interpret a passage. For this reason I find it is helpful to look at several of the earliest writings from the nascent Church, writings that come from people who either were taught directly by the Apostles and first generation Christians, or were only one generation removed. Several of these writings come from leaders of communities where we know for certain that the teaching of the Apostles was firmly rooted, and thus looking at how they carried out the apostolic teaching can be very beneficial to assisting in the formation of our own understanding of how best to interpret these passages.

Before I begin with some of the writings themselves, I would like to introduce the persons who have authored these works, so that we can know something of their background. We have:

  • Ignatius of Antioch – Probably the third bishop of the See of Antioch (though some traditions state he was the second, but it appears that Evodius was an early bishop there who died only a few years into his episcopacy), he became bishop sometime around the year A.D. 67. He was a disciple of Beloved John the Apostle, and certainly would have learned directly from Peter and Paul and Apostles. Theodoret and others report that he was ordained as bishop directly by Peter himself. Having been born right around the time of Christ's death, he certainly learned directly from first generation Apostles. He was martyred in approx. A.D. 110, and on his way to Rome to be fed to the lions he wrote a series of letters to seven different Sees throughout the Church. In these letters we have a profound sense of the theological understanding of the apostolic teaching on a variety of important issues.
  • Hippolytus of Rome – A late second/early third century, a disciple of Polycarp (who himself was a disciple of the Apostle John) who wrote prolifically and especially made it a point to record the various practices of worship handed down by the Apostles. Through him we have a magnificent glimpse into the Mass of the early apostolic Church.
  • Clement of Rome – While many in the early Church, including Tertullian, recorded Clement as being the first successor to Peter as bishop of Rome, it appears more likely that he was in fact the third such successor, presiding over that See sometime in the late first century (for several centuries the bishop of Rome did not last very long, as they were almost always martyred. This fact played a significant factor in the development of the primacy of that See, as the fact of their frequent martyrdom lent to the Roman church a great credibility throughout the greater Church). He is also the first Apostolic Father of the Church. There is only one writing of his that we know for sure is authentic, an epistle to the Corinthians, and so I will only examine bits from that one.
  • Irenaeus of Lyons – An early third century bishop of Lugdunum, Gaul (modern day Lyons, France), who was a disciple of Polycarp. His writings dealt with some of the earliest known heresies of the Church and thus he set forth one very well known work of systematic theology, Adversus haereses, or Against heresies. He wrote other works, as well, though we only have fragments remaining.

There are many other early Fathers whose writings we would worthily examine, and if I decide to look at any of them I will offer a very brief biographical introduction as above. How I will do this is instead of posting large sections or even complete works of these Fathers, instead I will focus each post on a Father and an issue, and publish any relevant writings of their related to the issue, and then I will offer a brief commentary of my own that also looks at what Scripture has to say about the same subject. I look forward to having a fruitful discussion as we examine the early Christian understanding of various apostolic teachings.

Health Care Reform: A Proposed Solution

My uncle is president and C.E.O. of a rather large international company, a man whose business acumen simply emanates from his person. He is a man of profound understanding of economic matters, an understanding that has proven itself over his lifetime as he continued to be recognized and climb the ladder of his organization. It is he to whom I frequently turn when I wish to understand a political debate or issue involving economic or financial matters. So when he sent me a copy of this letter he wrote to President Obama (and others, I believe), after reading it I immediately asked him if he would mind me publishing it on the blog. I am keeping his name anonymous (he hasn't asked me to do so, but I think I think it's best), but he has agreed to let me publish it and encourages anyone who reads it and likes what it says to pass it on to their congressmen and other legislators. I would love to see this letter generate some discussion, but keep in mind that I may not be well enough educated on such matters to participate very actively, and so if I seem to be silent, know that I am reading your comments with great interest. The letter deals with the current health care reform debate in the United States. Here it is in its entirety:

Dear President Obama:

    I am extremely concerned and confused by the recent discussions and proposal for health care reform. I have heard you, the President, senators and congressional representatives refer to the plan as a government insurance option that would be more efficient. These efficiencies are expected to be the result of: preventative medical care, reduced administrative costs and the elimination of corporate profits and bloated executive compensation. (The elimination of profits and executive compensation sounds like class warfare and I wish my government officials would refrain from this divisive technique for gaining support for their proposals.) If the plan is a more efficient/cost effective government sponsored health care insurance plan, then why does it require an additional trillion dollars in government funding over the next ten years? And if your plan is really a competitive insurance program, then the funding should be derived from insurance premiums or diverted from other existing assistance programs. If not, I assume it is just another expansion of the welfare state and it doesn't give the average working American anything. I have also heard you make comments about the need to make decisions about medical care or when to suspend treatment of a terminal condition in order to control costs. While I believe it is necessary to make these hard decisions, I also believe each person has specific preferences for features in a health care insurance plan driven by their unique circumstances and we should be able to exercise those choices when purchasing our health insurance. I know I don't want a government committee making those decisions for me and my family.

    I believe that we are a compassionate people and that we want all Americans to have world class health care but I believe there is a much better way of achieving this objective.

    At the current time health care expenditures in the United States approximate 16% of our gross domestic product. This compares to 9.5% for Western Europe and Japan. Government spending in the U.S. accounts for approximately 70% of all health care expenditures. (This includes: Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance for local, state, and federal workers.) based on this information, government expenditures for health care in the U.S. approximate 11.2% of GDP or a significantly greater portion of our GDP than Western Europe or Japan spend without providing coverage for all people.

    I feel that the best solution for universal health care is a system that allocates an acceptable level of funding, 7% of U.S. GDP, and puts that money (in the form of an insurance voucher) in the hands of each American family. In order to fairly allocate the funds, 7% of GDP, among the population, amounts individuals receive would be based on current health insurance underwriting so the various age groups would receive their equitable amount. The average insurance voucher per person would be $3,258 or 7% of per capita U.S. GDP. Since the U.S. per capita GDP is approximately 32% greater (when measured by purchasing power) than the three largest Western European and Japanese economies, this level of funding should provide health care for all Americans, with no out of pocket cost, comparable to our European and Japanese counterparts. If individuals were able to purchase comprehensive health insurance (must include a minimum suite of coverage with certain catastrophic coverage) for less than their vouchered amount, they would receive the difference in cash. This will provide an incentive for insurance companies to look for programs to reduce cost below 7% of GDP in order to attract more customers and continue to control medical costs.

    The difference between the current cost of health care at 16% GDP and the recommended 7% is attributed to several factors: out of control medical malpractice lawsuits; abusive use of medical services because the patient has no financial responsibility for the use/abuse (insurance is paid by someone else); Medicare and Medicaid fraud; free health care for illegal immigrants; and a lack of control on excessive medical treatment for terminal illnesses. Medical malpractice insurance and the resultant defensive medical care that has the medical practitioners ordering unnecessary tests and procedures in order to cover themselves in the event of a lawsuit provide little or no benefit to the patient. Medicare and Medicaid fraud is estimated at between $70 and $110 billion per annum. (We have also seen state and federal governments' mandates for insurance coverage of added benefits, chiropractics, mental health coverage, etc. at a time when health care costs are out of control.)

    The one good idea that has been discussed is the streamlining of administrative costs and medical record keeping. Unfortunately, the discussion in Washington is centered on having a single provider and worse yet the single provider is the GOVERNMENT. I would recommend at least eight providers of information processing, reimbursement, and record keeping so we have a dynamic market with real competition and ongoing innovation. These administrative services would also track patient satisfaction for every medical service and that information would be available to the general public on the Web. This would provide added incentive for doctors and hospitals to meet patients' expectations every day and give them needed information in order to select good doctors. (The current system of lawyers and medical malpractice suits has led to significant fraud, and in the instances of actual doctor or hospital error, settlements usually occur out of court and the cases are generally sealed so the general public is unaware of potentially inferior medical providers.) Insurance companies would continue to be a valuable component in the health care arena developing provider networks and designing innovative programs to meet individual consumer/patient needs. Individuals would be allowed to waive their ability to sue for medical malpractice in order to reduce their insurance costs.

    This change will require all people to make sensible choices with respect to the responsible use of hospital and emergency room services and near death care. It increases our individual choice and freedom and results in a reduction in government (combined local, state and federal) spending of $587 BILLION per year ($5.9 trillion over ten years) while providing health care for everyone. It eliminates health care costs to employers, making businesses in the U.S. more competitive with the rest of the world, which will help create new jobs in America.

    I hope that you consider this approach and I would welcome the opportunity to discuss my ideas for making America better with you.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Preparation for Consecration to Jesus through Mary – Self-Knowledge

Yesterday began for me the second phase of the spiritual preparation for consecration to Jesus through Mary, in the way of St. Louis de Montfort. The focus of these next seven days is knowledge of self, a most essential element of anyone seeking a deeper spiritual union with Christ. I've mentioned this before, but St. Teresa of Avila said knowledge of self is the true definition of humility. This humility that comes from self-knowledge is difficult to attain, and only truly comes from the working of the Holy Spirit within the soul.

It is through this action of the Holy Spirit that the soul comes to recognize her many blessings from God, the nature of her struggles, her strengths and her weaknesses, and ultimately her need to rely on God for all good things. This knowledge of self that comes from the Holy Spirit is accompanied by a greater knowledge of God, for in self-knowledge we recognize the reality of God as the ground of our own being, and the intimate union with God that is deep within every human soul. St. Augustine says that God is closer to us than we are to ourselves, and this is true because of the simple fact that so many of us do not spend any amount of time reflecting on our deepest self.

Knowledge of self is particularly important as we seek to root out sins in our lives. All of us commit various sins throughout the day, and Christ understands our nature and forgives us willingly and easily. However, there are some sins which seem to take a deep root in us, which we seem to commit with regularity. Rooting out these sins requires a deep spiritual knowledge of our soul because they frequently are an indication of some greater problem, some deeper issue, something below the surface of the sin that is impeding our spiritual growth.

At Mass today the second reading spoke to me especially in relation to this time I am committing in a special way to self-knowledge, as I prepare to renew this consecration. The second reading was from Ephesians 4:1-6, and St. Paul urges us to "live in a manner worthy of the call you have received." This for me has a double-edge meaning. In one sense, it speaks to the call to be holy, the call to live as a faithful disciple of Christ. For me, it also speaks in a special way to my call to religious life and to the Catholic priesthood. I know that I have certain habitual sins that until they are rooted out, they continue to prevent me from living in a manner worthy of the call I have received.

As I said, the action of the Holy Spirit is absolutely necessary in this quest for self-knowledge. It is for this reason that the prayers after the daily reading for this preparation begin with the Litany of the Holy Ghost. I continue to seek the counsel and sanctification that comes from the Spirit of God, so that I may grow in holiness, in love of God and neighbor, and in knowledge of self, which is the nature of humility. As an aside, knowing my spiritual struggles as I do, I can't help but look forward with joyful anticipation to next year when I begin the novitiate, a year in solitude and prayer where self-knowledge and spiritual growth can truly flourish.

As always, and as is the nature of this consecration, we seek always both the model of the Blessed Virgin Mary, who constantly pondered the mysteries of God in her heart, as well as her prayer and counsel, so that through her we may attain to that perfect union with Christ, and through her intercession continue to grow in holiness and in love.

Update on a friend

Thanks everyone for your prayers. I have heard from L. and she is alive. Unfortunately she has deleted her Livejournal account now. But at least she's alive. Thanks again.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

A prayer request

Please keep a friend L. in your prayers tonight. She has been posting very suicidal messages lately, and last night twice left a note saying that she was going to kill herself last night. Since then I have not been able to contact her. I only know her through Livejournal and do not know where she lives. I've just contacted the police but with basically no information I don't know what they can do. Please pray.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Twitter

I have no idea why, but I've created a Twitter account. No idea yet whether or not I'll use it.

The Wall Street Journal on Frank McCourt

The following story is the copyright material of The Wall Street Journal:

Frank McCourt, who died on Sunday at age 78, was the most Catholic of authors.

The rites and rituals of Ireland's Catholic Church of the 1930s and '40s exist at the core of "Angela's Ashes" (1996), his great Bildungsroman. That book's hilarious and irreverent chapter on Mr. McCourt's preparation for, and eventual ill-fated reception of, First Communion set down for all history what it was like to sit before an old Irish "master," named Mr. Benson in this case, and have very pre-Vatican II lessons pummeled (literally) into your pre-teenage brain.

"He tells us we have to know the catechism backwards, forwards and sideways," Mr. McCourt writes. "We have to know the Ten Commandments, the Seven Deadly Virtues, Divine and Moral, the Seven Sacraments, the Seven Deadly Sins. We have to know by heart all the prayers, the Hail Mary, the Our Father, the Confiteor, the Apostles' Creed, the Act of Contrition, the Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary. . . . He tells us we're hopeless, the worst class he ever had for First Communion but as sure as God made little apples he'll make Catholics of us, he'll beat the idler out of us and Sanctifying Grace into us."

Mr. Benson, who inhabits the same spiritual rectory as the fiery Father Arnall in James Joyce's "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man," didn't quite succeed in making an orthodox Catholic out of Frank McCourt. In fact, Mr. McCourt was one of the church's principal public antagonists. He delighted in delivering bawdy riffs against what he saw as the church's hypocrisy, cruelty and joylessness. "I was so angry for so long, I could hardly have a conversation without getting in an argument," he once said.

"We've been tracking him for a number of years," Bill Donahue of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights told me on Tuesday.

After the New York Times published an excerpt from the First Communion chapter of "Angela's Ashes" this week—in it Mr. McCourt describes how "God," i.e. the sacred host, became glued to the roof of his mouth—Mr. Donahue issued a statement denouncing the newspaper. "During his lifetime, Frank McCourt made any number of insulting remarks about Catholicism, all to the applause of his sophomoric fans," it read.

Somewhere Mr. McCourt, who loved to spar with critics, is smiling. "Anti-clericalism, they said about me," he told a newspaper reporter in 2002, who noted that Mr. McCourt's eyebrows arched with skepticism. "No. I just told the story that millions of other Catholics would tell about their own lives." Referring to the clergy sexual-abuse, he said: "Maybe now people are beginning to realize that I was just a bit too early with the truth."

Peter Quinn, the novelist and a practicing Catholic, wrote in an email that his friend was neither "contemptuous of believers in general nor Catholics in particular. On a trip we took together in 1998, he went to Mass with me on the Sunday morning that we landed. He respected the fact that I had reached my own peace with the Catholic Church. 'It's a good thing,' he once told me, 'that you're raising your kids in the Catholic faith. At least they'll have a map to follow or throw away. In either case, they'll know where they are.'"

That's what Mr. McCourt had. Even as he described suffering under its thumb, he developed an unbreakable affinity with the church's history, traditions and literature. He writes in "Angela's Ashes" about discovering Butler's "Lives of the Saints" in the library on a rainy afternoon—"I don't want to spend my life reading about saints but when I start I wish the rain would last forever." He told an Irish television host in 1999: "I read the 'Lives of the Saints' all the time. If you poke me in the middle of the night and say what are you reading, I'll say, the 'Lives of the Saints.'"

Readers will long benefit from his ability to evoke a Catholic milieu that will never exist again. To someone like me who grew up in the post-Vatican II church, it's a fascinating glimpse of a lost world. "The rain dampened the city from the Feast of the Circumcision to New York's Eve," he wrote of his childhood home of Limerick, Ireland. In just a few words, we are transported to a time when every schoolchild knew that said feast was celebrated on Jan. 1. The only picture that hung in the McCourt household, he writes, was of Pope Leo XIII in "a yellow skullcap and a black robe with cross on his chest." How many families have framed portraits of Pope Benedict on the wall?

Mr. McCourt felt it was impossible to fully divorce himself from the church. So when he stood before Pope John Paul II in 2002, accompanying a delegation of 40 mayors from around the world, the little Irish-Catholic boy in him took over. He knelt, took the pontiff's hand and kissed his ring.

"I got up and he's looking at me with his dazzling blue Polish eyes and extraordinary complexion," Mr. McCourt told the Commonwealth Club of California. "I had a feeling he knew. He knew what a fraud and a phony I was. Then I walked away. And I have to admit, as turbulent as my relationship with the church has been (although they don't know it and they don't care), I was walking on water practically. I was walking on air."

—Mr. Duffy is the author of "The Killing of Major Denis Mahon: A Mystery of Old Ireland," available in paperback from Harper Perennial.

Classic Literature

If anyone is interested, I have recently created a community on Livejournal for the purpose of discussing classic literature. The community can be found here. While you must be a member to make a new post, anyone can comment. The first book we are going to discuss will be Doestevsky's The Brothers Karamazov.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Consecration to Jesus through Mary – the First 12 Days

Today is the eleventh day of my preparation for St. Louis de Montfort's consecration to Jesus through Mary. The first twelve days of preparation are devoted to prayer and meditation focusing on the renouncement of the spirit of the world. The suggested readings began with the Sermon on the Mount and then from The Imitation of Christ. It is immediately clear by the prayers and readings for this preparation how this devotion to Mary and consecration through her has one singular purpose: perfect union with Christ Jesus.

Though entirely accidental on my part, I find myself greatly blessed by the fact that I am preparing for my renewal of this consecration immediately after reading Fr. Laird's Into the Silent Land. The practice that I have developed from that book has helped me more than I can adequately express. Today I spent several hours in Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, praying the Rosary and then simply praying in silence, practicing the Jesus Prayer (which I discuss here). Something about Adoration brings to my mind the awareness of the eschatological power of the Eucharist, as the Eucharistic presence of Christ draws all of creation towards its final redemption.

The reading for today for this preparation for the consecration was again from The Imitation of Christ, and I think this opening part especially was relevant to my struggle to renounce the spirit of the world (a concept I will discuss presently):

When a certain anxious person, who oftentimes wavered between hope and fear, once overcome with sadness, threw himself upon the ground in prayer, before one of the altars in the Church and thinking these things in his mind, said "Oh, if I only knew how to persevere," that very instant he heard within him, this heavenly answer: "And if thou didst know this, what would thou do? Do now what you would do, and thou shall be perfectly secure." And immediately being consoled, and comforted, he committed himself to the Divine Will, and his anxious thoughts ceased. He no longer wished for curious things; searching to find out what would happen to him, but studied rather to learn what was the acceptable and perfect will of God for the beginning and the perfection of every good work.

The renouncement of the spirit of this world does not mean that we must seek to suffer in this world. It does not mean that we must no longer enjoy the pleasures of this world. It does not mean that we must live this life in misery – far from it! What it does mean, however, is that we must live our lives with one singular purpose, which is to live in perfect harmony with the will of God, that we are to seek out God's will for us, that we are to strive to live perfectly according to the Gospel and according to the teachings of the Church, and that we are to do all that we can to grow in holiness. When this is our singular aim, we may freely enjoy pleasure when it is upon us; yet equally we accept suffering when it is upon us, as well. We direct the praise that people give us where it rightly belongs, which is to God, whose grace allows us to do all good things; we equally embrace any suffering and persecution that comes from our fidelity to Christ, which will often put as at odds with the spirit of the world.

This attitude of renouncement of the spirit of the world should not be seen as an abandonment of the world, but rather is the means by which we sanctify it. The suffering of this world exists significantly because of the fact that man does not live in harmony with God's will, and quite often actively rejects it. By living in the joy and tranquility of the Holy Spirit and the abundant love that comes from perfect union with Christ, which is the singular function of this consecration, we become the light of Christ in this dark world, thus providing for lost humanity a path to true enlightenment, a means to pure joy, and the way to perfect love. In so doing, we play our own Eucharistic role in this world, in that as we become conformed to Christ (a conformity which is greatly aided by our faithful reception of the Eucharist and use of the Sacrament of Reconciliation, as well as a devout life of prayer), we too draw creation to its eschatological end, its perfect redemption in Christ. Just as we receive the Body of Christ, so too are we the Body of Christ, and thus are called to perform the same function in the world.

The Blessed Virgin Mary is for us both the perfect model of faith herself, as well as the perfect guide and means to union with Christ. As model of faith it is she whom we imitate when she says, Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word (Lk 1:38, RSV). As the perfect guide and means to union with Christ, it is by inviting Mary, whom we rightly call Our Mother of Good Counsel, into the home of our hearts, just as the Beloved Disciple did after the death of Christ on the Cross, it is she who says to us and directs us thus: His mother said to the servants, "Do whatever he tells you" (Jn 2:5). We are the servants, and she guides us always to Christ, always exhorting us to let Him reign over our hearts. We invite Christ's and our Mother into our hearts as Queen, and as Queen she gives us but one order always and forever: "Do whatever he tells you."

The Virgin Mary's heart is always perfectly united to the will of God; it was on earth and is now in heaven. Thus by virtue of this consecration we indeed invite Mary as Queen of our hearts. In this manner we are perfectly assured that like her, we will have but one desire in this world: the kingdom of God, the perfect reign of her Son, and our own perfect conformity unto the will of God. This consecration then ensures the renouncement of the spirit of the world, and ensures that we will always bring Christ wherever we are, as it is He who reigns over our hearts as King.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Alice in Wonderland: More Burton/Depp Magic?

Disney is producing a Tim Burton directed, Johnny Depp starring version of Alice in Wonderland. From the preview it looks pretty darn cool, which I've come to expect from these two. Check it out:

A Successful (and cheap) Extraction

The dentist called me bright and early this morning and scheduled me for an 11 a.m. visit for an extraction. I informed them that I had no insurance right off the bat, but as I said last night, my mom was willing to pay. I was not happy about this at all, because I hate making my mom have to pay; at the same time, I was extremely grateful because the pain was extraordinary.

I got there right on time, and was seen almost immediately. They had X-rays from a few months ago, but they wanted to take better quality ones. When they did, they realized A) the tooth was in even worse shape than before (duh), and also that I have really long, thick roots. As such, they felt more comfortable sending me to an oral surgeon.

The dentist knows my family a little bit, and somehow knew that I had just been accepted into the seminary. That got talked about a little. The dentist is Catholic, and one of his assistants is, too, and her husband was in seminary for six years before they met. When I went to pay for the X-rays and the visit, somehow the bill magically disappeared.

I had a few hours to kill before my appointment with the oral surgeon, and I was exhausted from having not slept last night except for maybe 45 minutes. The dentist was right by my old church, St. Patrick's in Woodbury (shout out to Audrey and Felicia!), and so I stopped by the rectory a while, said hello, and then asked if I could be let into the church. One of the secretaries walked across the street and unlocked it for me, and I had the gorgeous church all to myself. I said a prayer for the dentist and his workers for their generosity, lit a candle, and fell right asleep in front of the Blessed Sacrament. I slept about an hour and a half.

I got to the oral surgeon's office about twenty minutes early, and they saw me almost immediately, as well. The surgeon was very nice, as were his assistants. Really nice. The extraction only lasted about 15-20 minutes, but man, it was so weird. I was totally numb and so I couldn't feel anything except the pressure. They had to crack the tooth and extract it in threes, and when they got that first crack down, I swear I thought my entire mouth had broken. It required so much pressure that he actually split my lip a bit, and had to put Vaseline on to stop the bleeding. After cracking some more and sucking out the shattered pieces strewn about my mouth, he realized he would need the drill, too. So they drilled a bite, and then got to yanking. Then they stitched me up and had me bite down on some gauze, and sent me on my way. It only cost me $250, which was about ¼ of what I expected to pay. That's great to know, too, because I have another one that is going to need it very soon, too, and probably won't last the year until I get dental.

WARNING: GETS A LITTLE GROSS HERE. DON'T CONTINUE IF BLOOD FREAKS YOU OUT


 

Now the thing is, part of my instructions are that I'm not allowed to spit. Yeah. Freaking. Right. The drive home is about 45 minutes, and half-way through I had gone through all the extra gauze he gave me. I was bleeding so much! After the last gauze was soaked through my mouth just kept filling up with blood. I had a WaWa bag that I kept spitting into and it was entirely gross. When I got to CVS to get my pain and antibiotic prescription filled I couldn't even talk to the woman because of all the blood in my mouth. And between all the blood loss and the blood swallowed I was starting to get really nauseous. So after I dropped off the script I immediately bought more gauze, ran outside, spit out all the blood in my mouth, and shoved in some more gauze. It's now been two hours and I'm still bleeding quite a bit, though it has slowed down some.

Anyway, I got home about 45 minutes ago and took both my meds. The Vicoden is making me a little loopy, so I'm going to stop now. Thank you everyone for thoughts/prayers/well wishes, and especially thank you all for some of the great advice.

OH I ALMOST FORGOT! Speaking of the advice that some of you gave, and I mentioned this in a comment somewhere but this needs to be shared. One of the home remedies suggested was that I take a clove of garlic and place it between my cheek and the bad tooth. Let me tell you something, it worked AMAZINGLY! I was still in pain, but it went down considerably after that. I had been taking Tylenol all night to no avail, and when I did the garlic it almost immediately got better. So keep that in mind.

Okay, thanks again everyone. I'm going to nap a bit now. I'll probably only use the Vicoden for today and then go back to Tylenol tomorrow. But if I'm a little silly later, you'll know why :)

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

A prayer request

Folks, I am in excruciating pain right now, and the best I can do is pray. One of the problems with Celiac disease is that over the years when it is undiagnosed one can become severely calcium deprived. The result for me has been that my back teeth are literally falling apart. Now one of my back molars has finally gotten to the point to where the nerve is completely exposed. I have been informed already that the tooth needs to be pulled, but I have no dental insurance, and it will cost me quite a bit more money than I have. So I'm just hoping to wait it out in pain and hope that the nerve just dies on its own. I won't have dental insurance for another year or so, so I don't see any other alternative. Right now I am literally dripping in sweat from pain. Prayers would be appreciated…


ETA: My mom figured things out, and is going to pay to have it pulled. Hopefully I can see the dentist first thing tomorrow.

On Temptation

Fire tries iron, and temptation a just man. We often know not what we are able to do, but temptations discover what we are.Imitation of Christ, Book I, Chapter 13

Too often we think of temptation as something that must be avoided at all cost, yet we see in Scripture and in the history of the lives of the saints that it is exactly in the confrontation with temptation that man discovers who he is, and in that discover, what he can accomplish in Christ. We see first of all that Christ Himself was driven into the desert to be tempted by Satan. He did not avoid temptation, but confronted it head-on. We see in St. Paul that he sought to be delivered from the experience of temptation, and thrice prayed to have it removed. It was in that prayer that he discovered the greatest truth of his own humanity: that he does not experience anything alone, but rather that his very life is a union with God, and thus it is impossible to do anything alone. So in response to his prayer for the removal of temptation, God instead responded, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness" (2 Cor 12:9). Thus, as the author of The Imitation of Christ tells us, it was in temptation that Paul discovered what he is able to do. Put simply, what he is able to do is nothing without God, but with God, "I can do all things in him who strengthens me" (Phil 4:13).

The contemplative life, to which all Christians are called to some degree or another, and for which man is built, is one that necessarily passes through the desert of temptation. What Paul discovered in his prayer for deliverance was the greatest secret of humility, which is that on his own he can do no good, but with Christ, he can do all things that lead him to the Good. St. Teresa of Avila says that humility is nothing else but self-knowledge, and humility is discovered in temptation. So we must not shy away from it, hide from it, but rather we must arm ourselves with the whole armor of God that we may be able to withstand evil (cf. Eph 6:13). By placing our trust in God and rooting ourselves deeply in Christ, by developing the true humility that is aware of our weakness and our sin, but equally aware of our union with God and the grace He provides, then through temptation will our souls be brought to perfection, purified as gold is in fire.

It is a difficult path on which we are called to walk, for it necessarily leads us into the desert. We all want to live in the sensible awareness of God, where when we pray we experience nothing but sweet emotional affections, where our senses are often overwhelmed. There is nothing at all wrong with this experience, but it is not the true depth to which we are called. God's indwelling is in a much deeper part of the spirit, and to get there we are led by a narrow path directly into the desert. This is a scary path, because when we are there we cannot sense God as we previously could, and it becomes a scary place where we have great fear that we have lost our way. We are like a log placed in the fire and all we can sense around us is ash, not knowing that we are actually being transformed by fire into fire.

We have several great examples in Scripture of those led into the desert before being led up the mountain of God, the mountain of divine contemplation, the mountain which spiritually represents our great awareness of God's presence in our lives. The two greatest of these examples in the Old Testament are Moses and Elijah, two forerunners of Christ who accompanied Him when He himself ascended the mountain of God. We see this with Christ Himself, driven out into the desert to be tempted by Satan. Both Elijah and Christ, after enduring their temptation in the desert, we know were ministered to by the angels, and so too will we be, if we but persevere and place our trust in God.

The greatest deception that Satan attempts to feed to us while we are in this desert is that we are defined by the temptations themselves, or by our sins, as if these temptations and these failings are who we are. This is a lie! On the mountain there are great storms and great weather, and at times even mighty earthquakes and fires. These are the temptations and the distractions and the loneliness and the emotions and the sins that we experience, and we tend to define ourselves by them. But as Fr. Laird tells is in Into the Silent Land, we are not the weather on the mountain, we are the mountain! The mountain is the awareness itself, the awareness that God is united to us as the very ground of our being, and there is nothing we can do to escape this reality. What is for us then is to persevere through the desert, and through the storms, through all the temptations and distractions and emotional pitfalls, and in this perseverance discover who we truly are, which is to say to discover our true identity as daughters and sons of God, united to Him by the very nature of our humanity.

We must not fear our encounter with temptation, nor flee from it, but instead recognize it as an opportunity to let God work through us, to perfect us through the encounter itself, and use it as an opportunity to demonstrate His deep union with us. For our part, we must simply, "Pray at all times in the Spirit, with all prayer and supplication" (Eph 6:18), and trust in the boundless love of God.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Diving into Dostoevsky

I am sadly drastically deprived when it comes to my reading of great literature. I am often so absorbed in reading books of theology that I forget how important a role other forms of literature can play in our understanding of the human condition and the human experience. This sense was awakened in me recently when I read James Baldwin's If Beale Street Could Talk, a book that moved me like I haven't been moved in some time from literature. So since one of my birthday gifts was a Barnes & Noble gift card yesterday I purchased three books that have been on my wish list a while: Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov, Crime and Punishment, and The Idiot.

Anyone have any other recommendations of great novels I should read?

A Beautiful Birthday

I had such a wonderful birthday yesterday. It amazes me that each year older I get, the better my birthdays are. I absolutely loved turning 30, and now at 32 I find myself more at peace and more in love with life than ever, and my relationship with God continues to lead me into the wonderful and mysterious depths of the human experience.

We had about thirty people over yesterday for the birthday. It was really touching that so many of my family, as well as some neighbors, came for what they really thought was just a birthday celebration. As it was, my birthday was just a convenient ruse to get the family gathered together so that I could finally officially announce my acceptance into the Order. A few of my family, and all the neighbors present, already knew, but most of my family was still in the dark. I have been very coy with them these past few months, and because of all the ups and downs of the past few years regarding my discernment I was not going to tell anyone anything about what I was thinking or doing until it was official. Once I heard from the Augustinians I wanted to wait until my aunt was up from Miami to tell the family. She is an IHM nun and has played a significant role in my spiritual development over the years, and it meant a lot to me for her to be here and find out in person. This is the path she really has wanted for me, only because it is the path to which she truly believes I am called.

As I said in an earlier post, it also meant a lot for my godmother to be here. She was standing right next to me when I finally made the announcement, and she was moved to tears. And for the second day in a row, reflecting on my godmother being there brought me to tears, also, as it also led to feelings of missing my godfather.

My family is just so amazing, and so it is no surprise that the day was just so completely perfect and wonderful. God cooperated, too, by giving us spectacular weather. Of course, you know, He did that just for me :-P My dad had two grills going for barbecued chicken, burgers, and dogs, mom and Aunt Lois made potato salad (and I will bet any amount of money that in an objective taste test their potato salad will hands down win the best ever in the world), there were deviled eggs, fruit salad, several cakes, peach pie, my sister-in-law Audrey's aunt made special gluten-free cookies for my grandfather and me, plus we had some outdoor games going on (bean bag toss, wiffle ball, etc.), and I got to play with my nieces and nephews. It was just a beautiful, beautiful day. Honestly, it may have been the best birthday I've ever had, and I've had a lot of great and memorable ones (along with a few that I don't remember!).

It's also really great how close we are with our neighbors. They are in so many ways as much a family to me as anyone, and they have been so supportive as I've gone through all of this. It meant so much to me for them to be there, and we really are blessed to have such wonderful people in our lives.

God still has a very, very tall order on His hands in order to make me into anywhere near a worthy priest. Of course, I have complete trust that He will do so, but it's nice to know that in the process He is going to use such beautiful and loving people as my family and friends to help me along. All of my priesthood will be spent finding ways to offer thanks for the gifts He has given me in them.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Wish You Were Here

This hasn't happened to me in about six months or so, but tonight in church, before Mass began, I suddenly became very aware of how deeply I miss Uncle Bill. I found myself overwhelmed with emotion and started to cry. It literally came out of nowhere. I think about him all the time, all throughout the day, very fondly and lovingly and not with sadness, but there are just so many reminders of him in my life. Plus, my family always says that I am Uncle Bill, because we both have so many of the same mannerisms, and I suppose since his death I've sort of taken up his mantle, so to speak, and I want to make sure his memory is always present with us, for it is a truly joyous memory. But tonight was different, tonight was, if only briefly, very sad. I know why, of course. Tomorrow my family is coming over, thinking it is for my birthday, but it is really so that I can finally announce to them my acceptance into the Augustinians. My godmother, Aunt Franny, lives two hours away and I did not think that she would make it, since we were only telling her we were having dinner for my birthday, but she is coming. It was really important to me that she be there. But my godfather will be missing. That's not true, of course, he will be there, and he is always wherever I am because he is always in my heart. But I wish he would be there to hug me and tell me he's proud of me (Ha, I'm probably romanticizing his memory a bit here, because I don't think he would ever actually say he's proud of me, but he would be proud of me, and I would know it). At his funeral when I gave the eulogy, I promised to remember him in every Mass I offered as a priest. During the time when I was not sure if this vocation would actually come to be, I often thought back on that eulogy and so often the memory of him (and undoubtedly his prayers for me now) guided me back to this vocation. I am so thankful for him, so blessed to have had such a beautiful godfather, and tonight, this weekend, I miss him so badly.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Johnny Carson and Walter Cronkite

Johnny Carson impersonating Walter Cronkite:

The Thomas Awiapo Story



From Catholic Relief Services:

Empowered for Life: The Thomas Awiapo Story


Posted using ShareThis

RIP Walter Cronkite

The Terrible Month of Celebrity Deaths continues, as broadcasting legend Walter Cronkite has died. The most trusted man in America lived to be 92. God rest your soul, Mr. Cronkite.


And now, enjoy some video clips of his first ever broadcast, complete with amazing commercials :) And wow, Dan Rather?!?!


Part 2 of Mark Shea’s Interview with Zenit on Mariology

Mark Shea: Mariology From A-Z (Part 2)

Former Protestant Comments on Mary and Ecumenism

By Annamarie Adkins

SEATTLE, Washington, JULY 17, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Even though the early Protestant Reformers praised the Virgin Mary -- some even had a great devotion to her -- Catholic Marian doctrine has become a stumbling block for many Protestants and divided Christians for over four centuries. 

Now, however, some Protestants are rediscovering the Blessed Mother, reinvigorating conversations between Catholics and Protestants about her role in the life and faith of the Church. 

Mark Shea decided to provide a comprehensive resource for this dialogue, and the result is "Mary, Mother of the Son," a three-volume work of apologetics published by Catholic Answers.

Shea is senior content editor at Catholic Exchange. In addition to his role as a popular Catholic bloggerspeaker, and writer, Shea is the star of an upcoming motion picture -- an adaptation of G.K. Chesterton's novel "Manalive." 

He spoke with ZENIT about why attacks on the Mother of God are really attacks on Christ and His Church. 

Part 1 of this interview appeared Thursday.

ZENIT: Why is Mary such a stumbling block to Christian unity? Shouldn't all Christians at least be able to unite around their Mother?

Shea: They should, but they haven't for roughly four centuries. There's hope in that number however, because it means that hostility to and fear of Mary is, historically speaking, a very recent phenomenon and one that really only took off well after the Reformation began. 

Many of the Reformers had a profound devotion to Mary and, in fact, accepted much of Catholic teaching about her. However, as Protestantism became more remote from Catholic teaching (and as, in English-speaking countries, Elizabeth I found it very convenient to supplant the cult of the Virgin with a political cult of the Virgin Queen), that connection failed and was eventually broken. 

Along with that went the loss of a sense of the sacramental, of the senses of Scripture, and of an appreciation for the feminine in the life of the Church. Mary came to be seen almost exclusively as a sort of pagan goddess and an actual threat to genuine Christian devotion: a perception that would have been absolutely foreign to the mind of any Christian in the first 16 centuries of the Church.

Read the rest here

Mark Shea’s Interview On Mariology

Zenit yesterday and today has published a two part interview with Mark Shea, a well known and respected convert from Evangelical Protestant to Roman Catholicism. He says that one of his biggest holdups in his conversion was Catholic doctrine on Mary – and I figured this fits in perfectly with the series of posts I am doing. He is in the process of publishing a three volume series on Mariology, which promises to be a great gift to the Church with its special sensitivity and awareness of the problems that Protestants tend to have with Marian theology. Here is part I:

Mark Shea: Mariology From A-Z (Part 1)

Former Protestant Addresses Marian Devotion

By Annamarie Adkins

SEATTLE, Washington, JULY 16, 2009 (Zenit.org).- One would think it impossible to spill any more ink about the Blessed Virgin Mary, judging from the number of Marian titles on the shelf at a local Catholic bookstore. 

But when popular Catholic author Mark Shea was considering entering the Church, there were no comprehensive titles where he could address his concerns as an evangelical Protestant about Catholic Marian doctrine and devotion.

Twenty years later, that book was still missing from the shelves, so Shea set out to write it.

The result is "Mary, Mother of the Son," a three-volume apologetics tool published by Catholic Answers.

Shea is senior content editor at Catholic Exchange and a regular columnist for both Inside Catholic and the National Catholic Register. 

In Part 1 of this interview, he shares with ZENIT why almost everything non-Catholics think they "know" about Mary is wrong. 

Part 2 of this interview will appear Friday.

ZENIT: Why did you write a book about the Mother of God? Where does your trilogy fit on the already crowded shelf of books and treatises about Mary?    

Shea: I wrote this book because it's the book I wish somebody had written when I was coming into the Church. 

I waited around for 20 years, hoping somebody else would do it, but when nobody did, I decided I'd take on the project (which is only fair since I'm the only one who really knows what questions and doubts I had and what would constitute a satisfactory reply to them). 

As to where the trilogy fits on the bookshelf, I suppose I'd say "Anywhere." 

That is to say, part of the reason I wrote it is because there simply wasn't any book I could find that did what this book does. For instance, the books on Marian dogma didn't deal with questions about apparitions. Devotional literature didn't answer questions about where the Church was getting all this stuff about Mary. Books tracing the development of doctrine didn't talk about the rosary. In short, the literature was out there, but most people don't have time to locate all the resources for the host of questions they have about Mary. So I created "Mary, Mother of the Son" to be a sort of "one-stop shopping" resource for virtually every issue a non-Catholic (or uncatechized Catholic) might have concerning Marian doctrine and devotion. 

It tackles everything from the sources of Marian belief and practice (a huge issue since oodles of non-Catholics simply assume the whole thing is a data dump from paganism) to the Catholic approach to Scripture to the four Marian dogmas to the broad spectrum of Marian devotion to private revelations and apparitions to possible ways forward in Catholic/Evangelical conversations about the Blessed Virgin. 

When it comes to Marian Willies, I've run the gamut in my own life and had to deal with pretty much every difficulty and problem with Mary to which non-Catholic flesh is heir, so it's a book that comes from my heart (and gut) as well as my head. 

Nothing in it is new (God willing) and the whole thing is ultimately a restatement of the Tradition. But it's a restatement that tries to run the gamut of Catholic teaching on Mary, not simply focus in on one specialized area. And it's written in order to be intelligible to the non-specialist.

Read the rest here

Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli on the Blessed Virgin Mary

The almost total absence of Mary outside of Christmas time among many Protestants is a rather recent phenomenon, and is not at all in keeping with what the reformers themselves had to say. Here I would like to share just a few quotes from the three most influential figures of the Reformation: Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli. Of these, clearly Luther has the strongest devotion to the Blessed Virgin, and it is strong in Zwingli, as well. Calvin had the most problems with Catholic Mariology, but he nonetheless recognized the truth of the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception, perpetual virginity, and the recognition of Mary as Mother of God.

Martin Luther:

"She is rightly called not only the mother of the man, but also the Mother of God ... It is certain that Mary is the Mother of the real and true God."

"It is an article of faith that Mary is Mother of the Lord and still a Virgin."

"It is a sweet and pious belief that the infusion of Mary's soul was effected without original sin; so that in the very infusion of her soul she was also purified from original sin and adorned with God's gifts, receiving a pure soul infused by God; thus from the first moment she began to live she was free from all sin"

"The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart."

"Is Christ only to be adored? Or is the holy Mother of God rather not to be honored? This is the woman who crushed the Serpent's head. Hear us. For your Son denies you nothing."

"Christ, ..was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him... "brothers" really means "cousins" here, for Holy Writ and the Jews always call cousins brothers."

"He, Christ, our Savior, was the real and natural fruit of Mary's virginal womb.. .This was without the cooperation of a man, and she remained a virgin after that."

"God did not derive his divinity from Mary; but it does not follow that it is therefore wrong to say that God was born of Mary, that God is Mary's Son, and that Mary is God's mother...She is the true mother of God and bearer of God...Mary suckled God, rocked God to sleep, prepared broth and soup for God, etc. For God and man are one person, one Christ, one Son, one Jesus. not two Christs. . .just as your son is not two sons...even though he has two natures, body and soul, the body from you, the soul from God alone."

"She is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin—something exceedingly great. For God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil."

"[She is the] highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ. ..She is nobility, wisdom, and holiness personified. We can never honor her enough. Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.

"No woman is like you. You are more than Eve or Sarah, blessed above all nobility, wisdom, and sanctity."

"One should honor Mary as she herself wished and as she expressed it in the Magnificat. She praised God for his deeds. How then can we praise her? The true honor of Mary is the honor of God, the praise of God's grace.. .Mary is nothing for the sake of herself, but for the sake of Christ...Mary does not wish that we come to her, but through her to God."

"It is the consolation and the superabundant goodness of God, that man is able to exult in such a treasure. Mary is his true Mother, Christ is his brother. God is his father."

"Mary is the Mother of Jesus and the Mother of all of us even though it was Christ alone who reposed on her knees...If he is ours, we ought to be in his situation; there where he is, we ought also to be and all that he has ought to be ours, and his mother is also our mother."

Ulrich Zwingli:

"I firmly believe that Mary, according to the words of the gospel as a pure Virgin brought forth for us the Son of God and in childbirth and after childbirth forever remained a pure, intact Virgin."

"I esteem immensely the Mother of God, the ever chaste, immaculate Virgin Mary."

"Christ ... was born of a most undefiled Virgin."

"The more the honor and love of Christ increases among men, so much the esteem and honor given to Mary should grow."


 

John Calvin:

"To this day we cannot enjoy the blessing brought to us in Christ without thinking at the same time of that which God gave as adornment and honour to Mary, in willing her to be the mother of his only-begotten Son."

"Helvidius has shown himself too ignorant, in saying that Mary had several sons, because mention is made in some passages of the brothers of Christ."